How do you feel about using AI?
- Joe Leonard, Jr. MEP, MCP, CEM, CGEMC, CHPP, CPE (CDR, USCG, ret.)

- Mar 28
- 5 min read
How do you feel about using AI? Scared, terrified the Cylons will soon be taking over, or are you comfortable with using it to some extent. A recent article in Domestic Preparedness Journal discussed an exercise conducted at the National Emergency Management Executive Academy (a program I HIGHLY recommend!). I learned about AI when I went thru NEMEA so I decided to try this exercise for myself. Most of us are familiar with Machiavelli and his book The Prince, either through reading it in school or through casual conversation. It’s been decades since I read it, so this exercise was a great way to refresh my memory of it.
My input into ChatGPT: “Using Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince, find those portions within his book about "leading up." Synthesize the material and apply those points to modern emergency management challenges, negative or positive, into a 1,000-word article.”
Chat GPT’s response follows:
In The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli explores the dynamics of power, leadership, and influence, including how subordinates can influence their superiors—a concept that today we might call "leading up." This timeless guidance offers valuable insights for modern emergency management professionals, who often operate within hierarchical structures requiring them to influence decisions made at higher levels to achieve mission-critical objectives.
This article synthesizes Machiavelli’s principles of leading up, contextualizing them for the challenges and opportunities in emergency management. Through these lessons, emergency managers can enhance their ability to align leadership decisions with on-the-ground realities, fostering resilience and better outcomes for communities.
Machiavelli emphasizes several key strategies that resonate with leading up:
Presenting Truth with Prudence: Machiavelli warns against revealing unvarnished truths to leaders without consideration for their temperament. “Princes should be willing to listen to the truth, but if you tell them the whole truth without prudence, you risk their displeasure,” he advises. The subordinate must be tactful, ensuring their message is received without provoking defensiveness or rejection.
Mastery of Perception: In The Prince, Machiavelli highlights the importance of appearances and perception in influencing leadership. He writes, “Everyone sees what you appear to be, few experience what you really are.” This observation underscores the need to shape narratives strategically, presenting information in a way that resonates with the leader’s priorities.
Navigating Hierarchical Politics: Machiavelli notes that “he who seeks to deceive will always find someone who will allow himself to be deceived.” While this could imply manipulation, in the modern context, it advocates for understanding power dynamics and effectively navigating them to achieve strategic objectives.
Balancing Flattery and Honesty: Machiavelli cautions against the dangers of flattery but also acknowledges the need to maintain favor. Striking a balance between honesty and deference is key to retaining access and influence.
Proactive Solutions: “The prince ought to anticipate problems before they arise,” Machiavelli writes. Subordinates must adopt a forward-looking approach, identifying potential challenges and presenting actionable solutions proactively.
Modern emergency management professionals operate in complex environments where they must anticipate threats, advocate for resources, and implement solutions—all while navigating political, organizational, and social constraints. Machiavelli’s principles offer practical strategies for addressing these challenges.
1. Presenting Truth with Prudence in Crisis Communication: Emergency managers must often deliver hard truths to superiors about resource deficiencies, risks, or impending disasters. Machiavelli’s advice to temper truth with prudence is critical in these scenarios. For instance, when advocating for disaster preparedness funding, bluntly stating the inadequacies of a budget may alienate decision-makers. Instead, framing the conversation around opportunities to enhance resilience and align with leadership priorities—such as economic stability or political capital—can make the message more palatable.
Modern Example: An emergency manager lobbying for flood mitigation funds might present data on potential economic losses from flooding while highlighting how proactive investments could enhance the jurisdiction's reputation for fiscal responsibility.
2. Mastery of Perception in Resource Allocation: Perception management is critical in emergency management, particularly when competing for limited resources. Machiavelli’s focus on appearances underscores the need to frame emergency management efforts as indispensable. By demonstrating how their work aligns with broader organizational or political goals, emergency managers can secure buy-in from leaders.
Modern Example: After Hurricane Katrina, emergency management agencies improved their image by emphasizing community resilience and public safety. This strategic alignment helped secure federal and state support for enhanced disaster planning initiatives.
3. Navigating Hierarchical Politics in Multi-Agency Coordination: Machiavelli’s understanding of hierarchical politics applies directly to the multi-agency environments emergency managers navigate. Building coalitions and fostering relationships with stakeholders is critical to influencing leadership. Understanding the priorities and incentives of each stakeholder can help emergency managers align efforts and gain support for their initiatives.
Modern Example: During the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency managers who successfully influenced public health leaders and elected officials demonstrated their ability to navigate political complexities, ensuring timely resource deployment and public communication strategies.
4. Balancing Flattery and Honesty in Leadership Engagement: Emergency managers must strike a delicate balance when communicating with leaders who may be sensitive to criticism. While flattery can build rapport, it must be coupled with honest, actionable advice to maintain credibility.
Modern Example: An emergency manager briefing a mayor on hurricane preparedness might begin by acknowledging the leader’s past investments in infrastructure while gently introducing gaps that require attention, framing recommendations as opportunities to build on existing successes.
5. Proactive Solutions for Anticipating Threats: Machiavelli’s admonition to anticipate problems is particularly relevant in the all-threats/all-hazards approach to emergency management. Leaders appreciate subordinates who not only identify risks but also present clear, actionable plans to mitigate them.
Modern Example: Emergency managers who forecasted supply chain vulnerabilities during the pandemic and proposed stockpiling critical resources were better positioned to influence decision-makers and enhance preparedness.
While Machiavelli’s principles provide valuable guidance, leading up in emergency management is not without its challenges:
Challenge: Resistance to Change Leaders may resist input that challenges the status quo or disrupts established priorities. Emergency managers must frame their arguments to emphasize alignment with organizational goals.
Opportunity: Building Trust By consistently demonstrating competence and foresight, emergency managers can build the trust necessary to influence leadership decisions.
Challenge: Navigating Political Pressures Emergency management often intersects with political agendas, complicating efforts to advocate for long-term solutions. Emergency managers must balance immediate political considerations with broader operational goals.
Opportunity: Enhancing Organizational Resilience By applying Machiavellian principles, emergency managers can foster a culture of proactive planning and adaptive leadership, enhancing overall resilience.
Machiavelli’s insights on leading up offer timeless strategies for navigating the complexities of power and influence, many of which are directly applicable to modern emergency management. By presenting truth with prudence, managing perceptions, navigating hierarchical politics, balancing flattery with honesty, and proposing proactive solutions, emergency managers can more effectively influence leadership decisions.
In an era of increasing threats—from climate change to pandemics—emergency management professionals must master the art of leading up. As Machiavelli reminds us, the ability to anticipate challenges and align leadership priorities with practical realities is essential for success. By integrating these principles into their approach, emergency managers can drive better outcomes for their organizations and the communities they serve.
The above took me about 60 seconds…so what do you think about the power of AI now?

Comments